The debate over the differences between leaders and managers is far from new. It has sparked extensive discussions among academics, consultants, and professionals alike, leading to a plethora of books, studies, and theories on the subject. Interestingly, this topic never fails to ignite strong opinions, whether among my delegates or in broader professional circles.
Drawing from both literature and my personal experiences—ranging from multinational corporations to small businesses, and from the private, government, and not-for-profit sectors—I’d like to share a distilled perspective on this enduring question.
Let’s start with the image of an entrepreneur. Picture someone who identifies a groundbreaking product or service—something they believe will solve a pressing problem.
They are driven, single-minded, and utterly consumed by their vision. This individual rallies others to support their idea, tirelessly markets its benefits, and finds ways to fund its development. However, do they pause to consider potential pitfalls or competitors? Likely not.
This person is visionary, possibly charismatic, and highly persuasive. But do they exhibit traits we associate with leaders, such as:
Often, the answer is no. While their strengths lie in inspiring and envisioning, they may lack the core managerial skills required for structuring and operationalising their ideas. So, are they a leader or a manager?
Now, let’s consider another example: a manager within a 300-person organisation. This individual oversees 12 direct reports and contributes to strategic decisions. They have a comprehensive understanding of the organisation’s short, medium, and long-term goals.
Their strengths include:
In every sense, this person is a model manager. But do they display leadership qualities? Can they step back to inspire a broader vision, navigate ambiguity, or influence the organisation’s strategic direction?
Roffey Park Management School offers a succinct distinction:
Both roles require a shared foundation of people skills, such as communication, delegation, and talent development. Similarly, Henry Mintzberg, a prominent thinker, categorised managerial roles into three groups:
Mintzberg’s insights blur the line between leaders and managers, suggesting that the two roles often overlap. Managers may need leadership capabilities, while leaders often require managerial acumen.
Reflect on the two examples provided:
The lines are not as clear-cut as they might seem. Organisations benefit most when individuals can balance and integrate leadership and managerial capabilities. The ideal professional is one who adapts their approach based on the context, seamlessly transitioning between leading and managing.
During the “Strategic Planning, Development & Implementation“ course, you’ll have the opportunity to delve deeper into these concepts. This programme combines theory with hands-on practice, enabling you to:
By participating, you’ll strengthen your ability to integrate leadership and management skills effectively, benefiting both your personal career development and your organisation’s success.
Projects are crucial for achieving business goals and play a key role in executing strategic plans. To ensure that projects…
This week in London, our delegates are from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Nigeria. They have come together…
Do we negotiate to strike a deal, or do we want a sustainable outcome which will be achieved through effective…